![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/288316/small_1621441816-avatar-nickw7.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 August 2015 | 65 replies
Yet those huge price jumps also mean huge increases in property tax revenues and we all know that nearly everyone in government LOVES having more money to spend!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/83796/small_1666118083-avatar-ukefuture.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 September 2017 | 32 replies
You would have to pay a 10% penalty plus you pay federal/state taxes.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/196215/small_1621432481-avatar-shaggysgirl.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 August 2015 | 8 replies
Regarding the above issues, a line of federal cases (Bolker, Mason, Maloney, etc.)provides taxpayer-friendly authority against challenges by the IRS.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/775937/small_1621497148-avatar-briang1518.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 April 2017 | 18 replies
The government gives tax breaks to churches, but we Orthodox Jews just have "too many churches" for some people's taste.
22 May 2017 | 17 replies
Federal law supersedes state law.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/663567/small_1625615125-avatar-davids484.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 January 2017 | 17 replies
Patti Robertson is that $1350 paid by the government for those houses in section 8?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/913435/small_1695044723-avatar-carlf31.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 July 2019 | 9 replies
Kindly please note that the verification letters confirming your accreditation status are good for a period of 90 days as per the SEC laws governing safe harbor verifications.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/18502/small_1621360152-avatar-semmmm.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 March 2008 | 22 replies
If the tenant stays and has a pet but the landlord is hostile that can be a federal offense with the government paying for the legal representation for the tenant.It really comes down to two factors.If the doctor is recommending a pet then the landlord really has little room to argue about the medical benefits.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1573/small_1621345702-avatar-gotchyadowhat.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 December 2009 | 17 replies
If so, we've got to be smart enough to exit the business early and move on to something that will be profitable under a socialist government - like being a local Socialist Party Leader or providing train service to your local Concentration Camp (or whatever it might be)!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1923/small_1621345850-avatar-mfd18.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 August 2008 | 39 replies
The lowest of the lower class live in government housing...and then there are the homeless.