![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/33326/small_1621366479-avatar-cashleverage.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
9 May 2009 | 3 replies
Having people e-mail a yahoo account could be misconstrued as using the forums as your own private list builder.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/6196/small_1659042161-avatar-ramsfo.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 June 2009 | 1 reply
P;ease e-mail me the specifics, thanks [CONTACT INFO REMOVED]
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/32408/small_1621366109-avatar-tonyseverino.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 June 2009 | 4 replies
Could u e-mail me this info?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/31323/small_1621365652-avatar-patrickd.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 June 2009 | 14 replies
> > While many of the provisions of the act are positive steps toward mortgage reform, the inclusion of private owners in the act (see section 101(3)(e)) will enormously reduce the housing choice of Ohioans and the ability of home owners to sell properties in this already-slow market.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/21292/small_1621361247-avatar-actomsek.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 June 2009 | 54 replies
But the heinous piece of the legislation is in section 101(3)(e), which defines the affected principals as:'(E) does not include, with respect to a residential mortgage loan, a person, estate, or trust that provides mortgage financing for the sale of 1 property in any 36-month period, provided that such loan-(i) is fully amortizing;(ii) is with respect to a sale for which the seller determines in good faith and documents that the buyer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan;(iii) has a fixed rate or an adjustable rate that is adjustable after 5 or more years, subject to reasonable annual and lifetime limitations on interest rate increases; and           (iv) meets any other criteria the Federal banking agencies may prescribe; and            Yeah, I know, confusing.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/27431/small_1621364027-avatar-motiv8td.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 June 2009 | 19 replies
PG & E had to block a section of the neighborhood off to get it under control.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/32408/small_1621366109-avatar-tonyseverino.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 June 2009 | 6 replies
bill=h111-1728Pay Attention to Section 101(3)(e).If you're terrified of this, let me ask you a question… have you read the House Bill?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/25444/small_1621363260-avatar-summitreig.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 November 2011 | 2 replies
The offending text of the bill is in section 101(3)(e), which defines who is exempt from being a ‘licensed mortgage originator’:'(E) does not include, with respect to a residential mortgage loan, a person, estate, or trust that provides mortgage financing for the sale of 1 property in any 36-month period, provided that such loan-- (i) is fully amortizing; (ii) is with respect to a sale for which the seller determines in good faith and documents that the buyer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan; (iii) has a fixed rate or an adjustable rate that is adjustable after 5 or more years, subject to reasonable annual and lifetime limitations on interest rate increases; and (iv) meets any other criteria the Federal banking agencies may prescribe.
15 June 2009 | 2 replies
[REMOVED] Jeff Friedman [PHONE AND E-MAIL REMOVED] Trish Natoli [PHONE AND E-MAIL REMOVED]