The retirement funds are tax sheltered, and the trade off is that there can be no direct or indirect benefit between the plan and a disqualified party (in either direction).If you were to add value to the plan's investments, you clearly could not receive compensation.If you were to add value without compensation, then you are giving the plan free labor, and effectively making undocumented contributions to the plan.  

I know some of you on the site have done so and I would really really appreciate it if I could get some examples or templates on what YOU or others you know have done.I feel like this is the most important question I've asked.I like what Earl Nightingale says about goals and their effect on the mind...

Sometimes it will say "OPR search" or something to that effect.

Remember, your time is valuable and needs to be spent where it will be most effective.

        One of the best benefits of scaling up a little is the effect of vacancies. 

And use killz, preferably the oil based formula, to prime everything that might be effected.

It is not cost effective (you are stupid) to do your own labor.

The one area where this will effect the landlords of smaller properties is when it comes to advertising their available rentals.

I understand both strategies are effectively doing the same thing but not sure if either way was a better option when it comes to student housing.

Assume for a moment you have a local team able to handle 100+ homes a year and have a few hundred homes under your belt.I have 20 days to find a cost effective solution......I'm thinking I should partner as these assets are spread amongst 26 states with about half in the SE of the country (where I have ample experience and resources).