(Of course they fail to mention that those same people had a 6% higher cost factor too!)

Gurus failed to mention this to me :P

REO Seller asking 99,900Property 1 1500 sq ft split ranch SF 3 bd 3 ba 2 car garage120k-138k ARV comps 109900-115000-151300-167900@ 65%- 20,000 REPAIR COST -4 POINTS -6 MONTHS INTEREST ONLY MONTHLY PAYMENTS @12% ROLLED INTO THE LOAN WITH 3 EXIT STRATEGIES in hopes of moving the properties quickly because even the best laid plan can fail as we were told and read we need to be prepared.WE WANT TO OFFER TO THE SELLER BUT NEED POF before we can even make an offer$55,200.00 CASH OFFER with hml or pml backing.REO Property 2205,825 ARV117,325 listed with the information we have found so farstill waiting on county assessor to get deed info from mortgage holder.

Most agents are incapable of thinking outside of the box and fail to see the benefits of working with investors.

Goldman Sachs got a HUGE bit of the bailout money and Lehmann Brothers was the only major hedge fund allowed to fail and disappear - clearing the way for Goldman Sachs.

Continuing to slam the messenger while failing to dispute the message is silly, imo , and gets old.

. # to the son.Contact me offline as if those all fail I might be able to track him and/or his relatives down for you.

Did anyone see Bernacke admit that the "too big to fail" argument was flawed and wouldn't be used in the future.

What they ALL fail to mention or specify is that not ALL short sale transactions are fraudulent, not all investors are crooks and of those that are, they are a small minority in which the guilty party failed to properly disclose and had full intent at the start.If you as an investor negotiate to buy a property for under market value and disclose to the short sale lender your intent to immediately re-sell for a profit, then no fraud occured and no laws were broken.

Boat insurance is available, and you failed to obtain the right btype of insurance for the occurence, and no claim will be paid on the damaged boat.While some companies might have defended a landlord in a liability issue under a renter's policy, as a co-insured, it certainly is not something that can be said in every state or in any circumstance, especially since specific policies are available to be written for such issues.