Not sure … I may just reach out to some friends in that income class and get their thoughts.  

Moving foward: 1) Enter into month-to-month leases instead of yearly (term) - they are the SAME to YOU but month-to-month give you all the leverage should this occur again in the future. 2) You should add a clause to elaborate on and expand on the current 'Noise/Waste' clause and the new clause should focus mostly on nuiscance and violation of other Tenant's quiet enjoyment and the remedies (fines) leading up to eviction if the issue is not corrected. 3) You should add a clause to protect yourself from the other Tenants (the good Tenants) ensuring to clearly spell out that you are not resposible nor do you guarantee that other Tenants will abide by the lease nor is it your respobility to enforce the lease vs. other Tenants, nor do you guarantee safety. 4) This is the most imporant one that will fix most of your issues: Because you are adding #3, you will now add yet another clause that gives ALL Tenants the right to enforce the lease in regards to your new 'Noise/Waste clause 2'  against any other Tenant who violates it and will idemnify you and hold you harmless, ensure to limit the right to only the pertinent clauses ---- essentially, if Tenant A complains to you that Tenant B is making funny faces at them... you can inform and remind Tenant A (in writing) that if the issue is a problem they have the right to pursue legal action vs.

Side question, assuming that you have a pretty strong income from work, would you hold your commercial real estate as long as you can and to by another on top of the existing one or would you 1031 to a bigger commercial real estate instead?

House hack potential of adding two separate rental income sources while living in the main house.

As far as a multi, personally if all things were equal I'd go for the multi for a few reasons.  1) Added diversification.. if one tenant doesn't pay, you can still cover property expenses with the other tenants 2) Shared capex... typically, one roof and one property to maintain but multiple streams of income 3) Less vacancy.. usually multi's rent for lower, for example one of mine is the sweet spot of 3 bedrooms for $1300. 

I would also recommend asking for reimbursement for lost income and sending documentation that substantiates the actual amount of rents you are out while this matter is being resolved. 

The conversion from resi to comm + the added income could drive up the value dramatically.Your only real hurdles (in terms of proceeding with production) are zoning and permitting.

Typical rates are 8-12% of income either monthly or yearly depending on manager.

@Adam M.Typically a new entity is formed to own it and that entity is owned by the two gpsIn this day someone who invests in a syndication and is passive will say they own 1,000 doors because they want to sound bigger than they are.Anyone can say whatever they want one social media and people will believe itSaw a post from a guru saying they own several thousand homes - I can pretty much guarantee you they do not.

And quitting your job will probably not happen right away, the income from your job will help you to get loans to buy real estate.