![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/148880/small_1621419520-avatar-bigsavedave.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 July 2015 | 18 replies
You just declared how much you depreciate the property as a whole.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/191649/small_1621432180-avatar-allfree.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 August 2015 | 21 replies
I'm thinking too that you may be using some creative accounting declaring the value of your deals with that liability unless you made up the difference with cash in the deals.
28 July 2015 | 7 replies
Do you want to go to court to fight over whether they get the percentage of profits?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/203816/small_1621432985-avatar-moreprops.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 May 2018 | 3 replies
Notary’s fees are approximately 2.5% to 4% of the declared value.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/66917/small_1621413891-avatar-rick_d.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 June 2015 | 1 reply
One of the ways you can obtain collection is having a lien placed over all real property within the jurisdiction of the court which granted the judgement.
27 June 2015 | 4 replies
It's the disposable income after taxes and rents that really matter.You'll find too that self employed people may have a bit more than taxable income declared or required if you look at net or gross from tax returns.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/148880/small_1621419520-avatar-bigsavedave.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 July 2015 | 4 replies
I found the court transcripts from the foreclosure proceedings in hopes that they would have a judgement amount or some kind of indication of what was owed or past due (of course there wasn't).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/146217/small_1631650391-avatar-jameswise.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 July 2015 | 0 replies
While the District Court accepted the Department's interests in allocating the tax credits as legitimate, the District Court required the Department to show that there was no other less discriminatory alternative to advancing the Department's legitimate interests.After defendants failed to meet this burden, the District Court entered a remedial order requiring the Department to add new selection criteria for distribution of the tax credits.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/227408/small_1621434617-avatar-akarrels.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 August 2015 | 13 replies
The tenant has disputed the claim and is threatening to take this to court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/338350/small_1683658737-avatar-kazslo.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 August 2015 | 2 replies
The retaliatory claim was denied, and the court found in favor of tenants in regard to the conditions.The tenants wanted almost $10k in attorney fees as the prevailing party.