You are right in between the ages of both of my sons.

Two years ago, I found a new hobby in the form of carpentry after designing and building my son's crib from scratch.

Here we go:For starters, Patrisha has succeeded at nourishing our son Aaron back from autism.

I was thinking about having my son who is 20 live in the property and become a partial owner of the property to make this work.

I have a tenant (45 year old man with a son of 5 years old) that is making me paranoid.

So right now we even don't know who else living there, his new "wife", son don't know which son, daughter and his grand kids.

I'm a mother of 2 sons who are age 6 and 10.

My son just used it.

I don't know the area real well...just what my son tells me who lives way on the north side of town/I-10.

@Daniel DietzYes to one.For two, fathers are disqualified parties but brothers and uncles generally are not deemed disqualified parties, so while it may be deemed aggressive, it is not prohibited on the surface if the father is  not the father of one of the sons mentioned and only IRAs and non-disqualified parties are investing.For three, it is similar to two except the father's IRA is removed from the equation, so it is not prohibited on the surface since brothers and uncles are not disqualified parties.However, under both 2 and 3 above, the IRS can always challenge both scenarios, and unless you can prove to the IRS that such transactions could have been made without the need of the other parties, they can still deem it prohibited.