data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d760/0d7602cddf7cc17f03a3f4b9699016b066efeada" alt=""
1 September 2016 | 137 replies
Originally posted by @Adrienne Bryson:I have no interest in arguing, but i an legitimately curious...What about those that depend solely on OPM to flip?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc1a6/fc1a6f2dac5f0c7c87ee8fd0c5bf757cea3f4a2e" alt=""
12 October 2019 | 9 replies
Any legitimate self-employment activity (including being real estate agent) would qualify you for Solo 401k.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df8c/5df8cedb21121326a5bf5f3f95378a1d2ce350ca" alt=""
14 October 2022 | 16 replies
-Is this a legitimate claim or scare tactic?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7d58/f7d58069213bd60b96f41ad2bca1530610f18c2f" alt=""
4 March 2020 | 69 replies
That is, if you find an undervalued asset in regard to the NOI because of, say, a bunch of amenities missing, or a bunch of additional revenue streams missing, or a bunch of expenses that can be shrunk, or especially a bunch of dated interiors (to a lesser degree, the exterior), one can find a legitimate and marketable way to raise rents, one could see a $50, $100, $150 per door rise in NOI.
27 October 2023 | 10 replies
Terry Hale is not a legitimate mentor or coach.
19 September 2016 | 6 replies
Is this legitimate?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/812c4/812c4f7da9a19eedf786f019b87e3be3af533854" alt=""
21 March 2016 | 21 replies
If you get a legitimate lease signed, with a security deposit made, with a move in date on the lease that makes logical sense, that rental income specified on the lease can be used to offset PITI on the departing residence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a4c/13a4cfb6caa47af453cb9592a4c9fa544e3285bf" alt=""
9 May 2023 | 40 replies
You can say the lease ends on a specific date, but you need to give a legitimate reason to end the lease on that date such as you or a direct family member are moving into the unit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e618a/e618a3b6026357158e5d4495e29d53af214102b8" alt=""
17 December 2015 | 24 replies
They disregarded the legitimate reasons for needing to inquire about the mystery truck.I see 3 reasons for needing to ensure the mystery person is or is not using that unit as his/her permanent residence alongside the signed tenant:Criminal -> evictionAdd'l wear and tear -> rent must go upIf the signed tenant leaves and the other person stays behind they aren't on the lease -> no legal recourse.Actually, there is always legal recourse.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6818a/6818aed0671bd4091bdab9317a6cc54a701f256a" alt=""
3 May 2020 | 53 replies
Google seems to have legitimately become a worse and worse search engine over the years as it tries to be more clever in choosing what it THINKS you should see...So you can think I'm a jackass if you want, but I did see such a study a few years ago.