![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22258/small_1621361791-avatar-djf11.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 September 2008 | 3 replies
Rents will only be able to be adjusted to what the going market rate is AND even more important, you will have to honor the previous owners lease with the tenants until it expires according to state law.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/18948/small_1621360326-avatar-tkaplun.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 September 2008 | 2 replies
Philly is really strict about transfer tax and there is probably no way on a transfer not to pay it.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22230/small_1621361774-avatar-kristian.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 September 2008 | 1 reply
California hoa law is the Davis-Sterling Act, I think, and that spelling may be not quite correct.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22267/small_1621361798-avatar-travisking.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 September 2008 | 6 replies
Maybe two.Now, you combine that with dems talking about changing foreclosure law to keep people in their overpriced homes as a necessary provision to get anything passed and wow.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/96/small_1621345348-avatar-mills014.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 December 2015 | 23 replies
Would you suggest I try again with a letter to the same list (law of repitition) or should I make an assumption that my list is bad and go out and buy a new list of absentee homeowners?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/21217/small_1621361206-avatar-vinnieb.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 October 2008 | 4 replies
Learn you local and state laws and customs.
23 September 2008 | 2 replies
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/22/dirty-secret-of-the-bailo_n_128294.htmlDirty Secret Of The Bailout: Thirty-Two Words That None Dare UtterDecisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.more at linkofgift
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22326/small_1621361826-avatar-dmj4.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 October 2008 | 31 replies
There is a little known precedence regarding predatory lending practices that could allow you, under law, to stay in your property and seek restitution in the form lost equity.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/9/small_1621345214-avatar-biggerpo.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 November 2008 | 79 replies
Although the law provided $18.3 billion in additional funds, the agency requested only $4.6 billion and did not even use all of that.
24 September 2008 | 1 reply
It probably already is against the law.