I bet you can buy two (or more) smaller houses (1200 sq.ft more or less) in a bread-and-butter neighborhood.Will your 2700 sf beast cashflow given the 50% rule?

. / $4,166.67Annual debt service “DS”Revenues:Monthly AnnuallyRental Income$935$11,220.00 (RI)Vacancy @ 8% ($74.80)($897.60)Net Rental Income $860.20$10,322.40 NRI)Operating Expenses:Property Tax- 1800 (this is being challenged currently, but no ruling at this time)Insurance- 1000 (estimate, I will get a quote on this for sure.)Maintenance- 1200 (Estimate)Utilities- 800 (Estimate)Advertising- 100 (Estimate)Total Operating Expenses (*Very Estimated*) = $4900 (TOE)Net Operating IncomeNRI-TOE= NOI$10,322.40-$4900= $5422.50 (NOI)Total Cash FlowNOI- DS= TCF$5.422.40-$4,166.67= $1,255.73Return on InvestmentTCF/ TCO= ROI$1,255.73/ $5,000= .2511 (25.11%)Cash on Cash (Considering- Down Payment, Upfront Repairs, Closing Costs)TCF/ TCO (W/repairs and closing costs)$1,255.73/ $6,500 ($5,000 DP + $0 Initial Repairs + $1,500 Closing Cost) = .1923 (19.23%)My thoughts regarding this deal: I think the asking price is a little high for the property considering it’s age, condition (off of visual inspection from the street level only), location, what limited comps I could find.

I found some properties, but I had to rule them out because they were either too old or the asking price is more than the tax value.

With all of the new regulations and rulings coming down on banks lending rules change daily these days.

I also think we should be able to cash flow on the note (based on the 1% rent rule - valued at $135,000).

Are they taking that into account or can this be an exception to that rule?

I want to sell the place and buy rentals aiming for properties that are in line with the 2% rule.

General rule of thumb, the buyer will figure out a way to vacate the contract if they so wish within the allotted time frame.

I don't know your state's RE Commission rules.

With the corner and access you make the rules.300k is way to low and they can make up for it on the other 23 acres giving you more money.You really need someone on your side.If I were there I would work for you and NOT the developer.They are trying to wear you down and see the lowest you will take.You know the income approach but it helps also to have knowledge from the other side like I do of what the developer will do with the property and how they will most likely extract the most money for themselves.This will help you not hold them hostage but capitalize on their problem.Sounds like an unseasoned developer because they should have known long ago they needed your property to make it work.From an access,architectural,and design standpoint they need your land.