data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ab2a/1ab2a93add0d0b0ced7e2fb3877744d915146dcd" alt=""
8 June 2014 | 7 replies
One of the best benefits of scaling up a little is the effect of vacancies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b70b9/b70b9d3893b4bcc38674c6dbf8360b6415ccddf8" alt=""
11 June 2014 | 22 replies
And use killz, preferably the oil based formula, to prime everything that might be effected.
10 June 2014 | 5 replies
It is not cost effective (you are stupid) to do your own labor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c383f/c383f4b6bb36d9d16c9220cb8b3b645365825241" alt=""
8 June 2014 | 9 replies
The one area where this will effect the landlords of smaller properties is when it comes to advertising their available rentals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3105/b310593348e49488b7fa750efa5c57c3d7bad1cf" alt=""
11 July 2014 | 15 replies
I understand both strategies are effectively doing the same thing but not sure if either way was a better option when it comes to student housing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9ef5/e9ef5c0d144186a8fc805f336003e32d352613d7" alt=""
8 June 2014 | 3 replies
Assume for a moment you have a local team able to handle 100+ homes a year and have a few hundred homes under your belt.I have 20 days to find a cost effective solution......I'm thinking I should partner as these assets are spread amongst 26 states with about half in the SE of the country (where I have ample experience and resources).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9193a/9193a77faf1d80e35f827c7e7d5a7f57d26e6ee7" alt=""
9 June 2014 | 4 replies
This agreement shall become effective as of the date of the last signature.7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff2f6/ff2f694253cb2c24a2f467a839e12f9c67b3ed7c" alt=""
8 June 2014 | 12 replies
So over time your "expense" curve will get alot smoother and stay around that 50% number overall.With one house you might be at 40%, 40%, 40%, 125%, 40% each year...WIth 20 houses, you'd be more likely around 49%, 51%, 48%, 52%....One last point - that bad year above at 125%, you're effectively out 16 months of gross rents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f95f3/f95f3d672780b7f447db28b2bc01200e662cc122" alt=""
8 June 2014 | 9 replies
Does the pre approval process effect your credit?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2677/f26772268b4f2baf696288a0003b459787716f85" alt=""
22 June 2014 | 11 replies
It will be secured against this house worth $80k" That pitch is especially effective if you get around other investors.