Renovated the property, painted, new carpet, appliances, added a washer and dryer What was the outcome?

Renovated the property, painted, new carpet, appliances, added a washer and dryer What was the outcome?

I invested $1000 worth of paint and carpet in to Unit B and moved in renters form Colorado for $1000/mth.

My wife and I just moved into our SFH and are ripping out carpeting currently.

.- Damage in excess of normal wear and tear.Source: https://www.thebalancesmb.com/massachusetts-security-deposit-law-2125077 Here's another one:Quote:After a tenant moves out, the landlord may use all or part of the security deposit for the following reasons:- Unpaid rent (unless validly withheld or deducted by the tenant) and, if applicable, water charges- Unpaid increase in real estate taxes (only applicable if the lease contains a valid tax escalation clause)- The cost of repair of damages caused by the tenant, other occupants, or their guests (does not include pre existing damage or routine painting, carpet shampooing, etc. that is performed because of normal “wear and tear.”)Source: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/find-out-what-landlords-can-use-security-deposits-forAnd another:Quote: When you move out, your landlord can use your security deposit to pay for: - Repairs for damage that are not "reasonable wear and tear." - Unpaid rent, unless you legally withheld rent for bad conditions.

But you don't paint the house, add a roof, give them new carpet, install central A/C, etc.

Bottom line is either way I have to change carpet if tenant stays or if tenant goes but carpet is mostly dirty than worn out, so tenant is partially at fault.

Shampoo carpets.

All depends on what side of the deal you are on.Buyer pro's; *They can get a good dealBuyer con's; *They can sit for months due to ineptness of other parties out of their control, or due to their own ineptness or lack of reality or understanding of the process*They aren't going to get the seller to pay for closing costs, carpet allowances, roof credit, etc.Seller pro's; *They can get out of the loan without a foreclosure*In some states, they are prohibited from making a contribution to the short sale and/or the lender is prohibited from applying any deficiency back to the sellerSeller con's; *They can sit for months due to the ineptness of other parties out of their control, or due to their own ineptness or lack of reality or understanding or understanding of the process*They have a short sale on their credit and get all miffed when they finally realize its almost as much of a hit on their credit as a foreclosure isLender pro's;* They get to dispose of an asset quicker and cheaper than going through foreclosureLender Con's;*They can sit for months due to the ineptness of other parties out of their control, or due to their own ineptness or lack of reality or understanding or understanding of the processAgent Pro's;*They get to help out a buyer/seller*They get to earn a full commission*They get to be noticed by a lender when they are competent for future deals (i.e.

The plan is to paint,carpet, improve lighting, landscaping, and possibly replace the sign for starters.