25 July 2016 | 1 reply
If his contribution is $60,000 then the distribution should be proportional to the investment assuming he is taking the same amount of risk.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f8be/7f8be8c16e3865cec1b4ef99abe626de2199266f" alt=""
28 July 2016 | 11 replies
As you can see, the principal is only decreasing by about $40/m at this stage (but ever so slowly, increases as a proportion during the life of the loan, so that in another 231 months, the amounts are reversed, leaving only about $40/m for interest and the rest towards the principal, finally*).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b27f5/b27f512839938462041b94e5574ee41632cff7f3" alt=""
12 August 2015 | 3 replies
We have bought 7 houses, 6 rentals and every closing has been an adventure of ulcer proportion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42b01/42b014d4cfe3d3662291438e65d30e0ea601da28" alt=""
21 January 2019 | 58 replies
Total payments made actually equal the purchase price)* The amount paid in rental payments is an excessively large proportion of the total sum required to secure transfer of title to the property.* The taxpayer can acquire title to the property under a purchase option price that is nominal in relation to the value of the property at the time the option may be exercised.* Some portion of the rental payments is specifically designated or readily recognized as interest.* The sum of the rental payments and purchase option approximates the original purchase price plus interest and carrying charges.* The lease requires the lessee/buyer to make substantial improvements to the property.So, yes, you can do a lease option that the IRS deems is a disguised sale (which most lease options are, including John Jackson's) and have it fall under Dodd-Frank.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e387/8e3875c9cd38fdb476fbb297b440bcb7955c4690" alt=""
30 August 2019 | 7 replies
Traditional Financial Planning advice goes out the window when you start investing in real estate.Questions for BP:- What proportion of your total wealth is held in real estate?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36003/360030127b8c6e1207d394bf1002ac839d5c14b4" alt=""
26 December 2016 | 151 replies
I do the math and am maintaining $25k reserves (which will grow proportionally with my portfolio).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88031/88031b747a8b455d53eca6bab7e02a2c9490ec07" alt=""
10 October 2015 | 8 replies
If he wants ongoing drip feed (net) income, then his proportion should be much closer to 0% than it is to 50%.What you could have asked is: is my friend being too greedy?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/342bc/342bcc2eedb9f5344683702dde0ca250e9e10322" alt=""
12 October 2015 | 12 replies
A good proportion of the ones that invested before lost nearly everything during it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f9b7/3f9b7a5558cfe286f6adb568fbb8f4eb839ddea3" alt=""
7 June 2016 | 57 replies
This is just my observation.Wouldn't owning 15+ homes just increase the risk of evictions proportionally?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7199f/7199f3c394b420efa5724d5d69d0f8658c126a6f" alt=""
11 January 2016 | 11 replies
While your insurance and mortgage payments may have a variable rate of cost proportional to your home value, certain repair costs will have a more fixed rate cost, and thus decrease as a percentage of the home value as that value goes up.