I invest for income and therefor logic dictates purchasing multi units.

Be smart though, and make sure it's a good logical investment.. some people will say no, don't touch retirement.. but if you put it within your retirement plan, I think it's just another way to leverage yourself.  

Obviously it's somewhat subjective based on my risk tolerance but there must be some logic to this that is objective.  

The logic is to always sell HIGH and we are at an all-time high.

@Brian Adzadi I see your logic.

Not that it matters much, but IMO the most logical approach (particularly *because* I don't benefit either way) would be to limit STRs only to properties in multifamily or mixed use zones, and then only if an annual license is in hand.I mean, we zone land in our City for a reason; we want a city where people can choose properties that promote different lifestyles. 

We have looked into buying a house but it doesn't seem logical when we dont know what the future holds.

In Psychology, I believe this would be considered a logical fallacy.

Their logic is that real estate investors buy up property and make it unaffordable for the average people who want to live in an area.Oddly enough I have seen this argument here in parts of Omaha, which seems laughable considering there is a huge supply of housing here priced under $100,000.

You can prove just about anything using statistical logic.