., it's just your opinion and not actually part of any federal housing law - then that needs to be clear as well. 

The government may tell me I must accept ESA pets but they do not choose my tenants for me.

I do realize that some states or localities have rules regarding this but I only rent to individuals, not the government.

It's just a matter of whether big money will also invest and if local government really wants it.

I am trying to build a city, and when I recently tried to acquire a permit to build on a piece of land in the US, I was told to talk to a realtor, however my project would’ve taken place over several plots of land.Money is not really an object but the way I am trying to go about buying the land is confusing to say the least.Would I go and buy all the plots that are going to be affected by this project, because in doing so it would invariably create little pockets of land that still belong to the government - or would it?

I personally would rather have a government deposit each month than an A class renter even, but that is me.

One other item of note, while I am certainly not an attorney, the rules outlines in the uniform partnership acts of nearly all states are there to govern when no agreement exists.

The law is sometimes made by the city or state besides not just Federal. 

@John Teachout We have a standardized lease drafted by the government, showings are not mentioned, rules revert back to the LTB, which also doesn't state refusal of entry/showing, if that even exists.

Connecticut tenant/landlord law governing security deposits leaves it so vague, just saying you need to provide an itemized list with amounts “of repaired damages, not including normal wear and tear”In my eyes, he signed the lease saying no smoking, the smoke smell wasn’t there to begin with, and in order to remediate it back to move in condition I have to incur a charge to get the proper equipment.