data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b71/d7b71f1fc6de1e9097d7efe5701e3880eafef33c" alt=""
25 January 2017 | 5 replies
It can also subject you to being considered in the same light as a mortgagee, which would carry with it a host of legal requirements that you need to adhere to.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa56e/aa56e2dbc08b388bdc6617d9b69825b7b8b1d20d" alt=""
23 January 2017 | 2 replies
After reading, watching many video and gaining a ton of point of views on investing, I came across this question....Can I legally enter into a "subject to" agreement with the owner while they have a property up for sale as a short sale or anytime during the foreclosure process?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45797/4579778297a4357046349960cafeb1ee48b885f5" alt=""
25 January 2017 | 7 replies
Anyways just my 2 cents, I’m certainly not an expert by any means, would be interested to hear what others have to say…BTW there is a great article somewhere on BP by Ben L that talks about this subject (how cheap properties get killed by capex), it's a good read.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c38cf/c38cfe33186b669212eca2008000a097aacffdc7" alt=""
2 July 2017 | 2 replies
Understand investor world. fairly organized.Michael Florence @ Harlan and Florence: low price ($350). very flexible. amazing background in subject to.
2 February 2017 | 27 replies
@Garrett CanterOK if you want to start a huge battle on Biggerpockets start a post on this subject, I have posted on this before, many people disagree with me but this is my real life story.So during the financial crash I'm just casually talking to a big time local personal injury attorney who goes to my church, I say well at least this down turn doesn't hurt you, he says actually it does businesses are hurting so bad they are dropping their insurance, and its almost never a feasible to take legal action if the they don't have insurance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af847/af847bbd0eb3878e27b6106ec587bc08de23ec4b" alt=""
30 January 2017 | 3 replies
@Anthony Perez 6 families are subject to rent stabilization (if it was built before 1974 which I assume it was) you can only raise rents based on what the city sets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bb14/6bb1469b1321df971771d620099799997cd71298" alt=""
2 February 2017 | 1 reply
From the sounds of things, the 60K is still there, it's just not subject to interest, only to payoff.
31 January 2017 | 3 replies
It's certainly a touchy subject, but that's how I would approach it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed8b8/ed8b86cb7ade95b1aa322548761cb71baf2373a6" alt=""
1 February 2017 | 8 replies
The frequency of the subject property being a deal is probably lower then if you went with some paid sources but we make that up with volume of analysis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8266c/8266cd705a14b211d64af8531e7ab7c6dccd4269" alt=""
6 February 2017 | 8 replies
There will no doubt be some experts there on the subject.