The owner's husband passed 3yrs ago and her son is in very poor health (living with her).

I currently work part time so I can get health insurance.

I'm simply someone with a lot of experience when it comes to TCPA lawsuits because there's nothing I hate more than health insurance or auto warranty companies cold calling/texting my personal phone.

We pay extremely well at 20% above market, 100% health paid by us, and fully funded retirement accounts by us.

Getting monthly sales is more valuable every quarter because you can spot trends sooner of health of the business and where it is going.

Math becomes a problem in that Fannie/Freddie only want to see you have a 43% (in reality a bit higher...but let's use 43% for this illustration).

You will need to register with the state, the town will likely want you to register with them to have a health inspection to make sure the house is in good condition to host guests.

I created a couple of charts/matrices to illustrate the affect that rapid rise in interest rates had on monthly payments, which in turn affects affordability.

Our typical "recommended" cap is equal to one month rent, although we have authority to spend above that to stop or prevent further property damage or health hazards resulting from unusual or natural events.

Is it not reasonable that these improvements attract quality tenants and that health-conscious tenants/buyers would consider this a plus and be willing to pay a little extra?