The main issue I have in Miami obtaining financing is passing the owner vs renter ratio in the condo questionnaire, this ratio is always off causing me to lose financing and purchase my properties cash.

Fast forward to a hastily completed job that did not fully meet the requirements and caused additional problems/work for the buyer (me) to remediate, and a seller unable/unwilling to complete the agreed-upon work within the confines of the Purchase and Sale Agreement terms, or provide appropriate credits for outstanding work. 2.The offer on this home was based on four major items being completed (we have in writing from listing broker): new roof, crawlspace insulation, attic insulation, french drain/sump pump.

This seems like it could be a potential cause of conflict: if I own one side of a duplex, what if a shared part of the structure (the roof, for example) needs to be replaced, and the owner of the other side doesn't agree?  

House is in Sharon Hills.Concerns include giving former owner, say, a month but then they wasting my time and reigning on the agreement.Furthermore, there is the possibility of them causing property damage.

I've represented many clients who've been involved with accident related damages caused by tire blowouts, traffic accidents, road damage, et.al.Equally as important are the knock down and set up crews.

Cause the way I read it is it can only be used for that.

Cash on cash is a useful metric to compare investments, because it removes the effect of leverage (which tends to be different on investments, causing an unfair comparison otherwise).IRR was invented as an attempt to determine if any *single* investment is worth investing in.

The house I bought, I won with the escalator cause.

You could allow applicants to enter without supervision and this would be fine until you have that one person that causes a problem, like squatting, and then you will realise how reckless a decision it is to allow a stranger into a property worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars unsupervised.The reality is that if a owner does not want to do the work or is not interested in doing the work associated with operating their business it would be wise to either hire a responsible property management company or sell.As some have indicated there are simple and cost effective ways to do it but safe is not possible.

The purchase sub2 the existing mortgage was NOT the cause of any danger or added risk in this transaction, rather the purchase with occupants who had a personal relationship with the seller was the factor which caused this long drawn drama.