data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57adc/57adc2f61282aaa312c2e07684636b7383189766" alt=""
16 June 2017 | 9 replies
The "it was grandpa's house" objection is just a ploy to cover up the "I'm trying to eat an elephant in one bite" reality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff17b/ff17b220315204b46b23b8605c2729b69f7cfbb7" alt=""
16 July 2017 | 5 replies
One thing to consider is, if the neighborhood is all SFR, then the neighbors may strongly object to a duplex going up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aff4c/aff4ca9217d6c35065e1c7863b8e92f727077d6c" alt=""
16 July 2017 | 11 replies
A 10 year mortgage isnt an excuse to raise rent.Using an SFR for instance, if you are to cash flow, rent at a minimum should equal: Rent=Mortgage payment + Operating Expenses + Required Monthly CF orRent=Total Expenses + Required Monthly CFIf you are told any different, the objective isnt CF.What you will also find is that in many markets, the market rate (what people can pay) for rent may be lower than just the mortgage payment alone or lower than total expenses (mortgage payment + operating expenses), in which case you will have a negative CF -- translation, find a property that actually does CF.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37d8d/37d8d4fea90b1e7d9ab0f579256ad0bba5fdf558" alt=""
30 August 2017 | 8 replies
@Dan Heuschele I'll ask about it next week and post what they say.The objections are coming from people whose neighborhoods were SFR and are now vacation rentals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba793/ba793493a13b2a9648209d775110c49737a8d8cb" alt=""
26 August 2017 | 6 replies
Different objectives might steer you towards perhaps higher end neighborhoods with greater property appreciation value, or it might encourage you to make different financing decisions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff94/7ff94409ccb9ce80a981198af3391803006ed4bd" alt=""
9 August 2017 | 25 replies
Because the proposed amendment changes the use by prohibiting certain rentals, I think this provision should apply.I also have a problem with the Written Consent as it does not allow you to vote no.Written Consent says deadline is Jan. 31, 2018.We could put together a letter objecting to the proposed amendment if you’d like."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98bdd/98bddaa80c9d926677ca6eb016bbbfaf28149885" alt=""
13 August 2017 | 11 replies
If you don't have another investment objective in mind, you might want to start with the refi/PMI elimination and then circle back down the road with a HELOC to use on another purchase.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f59da/f59da5ca7c37a6c5ebd87955d3cceba93486ab03" alt=""
8 August 2017 | 10 replies
I don't want to get caught staring at a shiny object.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d91e1/d91e1e65916dd6123dcad8fdf369b1c39c82e32d" alt=""
4 September 2017 | 6 replies
I would advise you sketch out your objectives (near, mid, & long term) and spend few hundred dollars on an accountant who specializes in real estate to help you select the structure which best fits your needs (near and mid-term), but which can be transformed as necessary to meet your long-term goals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ae/022aec590f867705ca15848a49925524d9b70b32" alt=""
31 August 2017 | 6 replies
It doesn't mean these are objectively bad investor markets or that they will never appreciate but just "being larger than 12,000" doesn't guarantee appreciation.