(although after reading through the forums and diving deep in the google machine it is hard not to consider every market, suffering from newbie shiny object syndrome for sure!) 

They would send me Instagram reels and videos here and there on objections and scripts for tips and motivation.

After tenants moved they are objecting to the security cameras (doorbell and floodlight) even though I have given them shared access to the camera content and it was mentioned in the contract that the premises comes with cameras. is it legally allowed to use surveillance cameras What is the best course of action in your experience 

There are multiple scenarios to consider without more specific facts.I think so long as you apply objective criteria (e.g., first to apply, first to tender a deposit, etc.), then you are fulfilling your legal duty to not discriminate. 

Originally I was told to require all tenants to obtain renter's insurance, but I have had prospective tenant's object to this idea because they are mostly college students who own few items of material value. 

Then the objective would be to find properties with good cash flow with no expectation of capital appreciation.

Well the whole objective of the Wholesaler is to make quick money.

If they object to providing it I tell them I may not be able to report on time payments and ask why they would object to that.Following that conversation I’ve never had anyone not provide it.

There are different investors out there, looking to achieve different objectives.  

It's important to have a clear objective in mind when investing in real estate.