From my point of view, D versus DDD is not very much of a distinction, because it's too narrow.

This is an important distinction; however, it's also true that the American auto industry needs to revamp itself and there's no better time than the present to do it.

In no circumstance do I see myself giving them back the EMD.Anyway, the only distinction I was really looking to make was whether or not the first buyer would have a legitimate claim to the house if they didn't go the LP route.

Joel, wrought iron railing was completed shortly after the video so no danger there.

In the near future, the leverage will be much lower and therefore the negative impact of possible rate increase is minimized.As for a stock trader, I think it is prudent to allocate 1/3 of his capital in real estate, and the remaining 2/3 in stock trading.For me, deflation is more dangerous than inflation.

Dealing with dirtbags can be dangerous.

Of course, that would be against code even though it would not be any more dangerous than using an adapter except that it gives the illusion of a ground to someone who wouldn't know otherwise.

The biggest issue with rent control is that for people who "feel protected" they loose the reality of market and do not see the dangers of their situation. 

This landlord sounds like a dangerous nut job.  

Encouraging a seller not disclose a potential issue in a buyer's mind, even if "it's nothing", is dangerous and not ethical.What is minor to you might not be to a potential purchaser.