data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9f37/e9f371e49316977f687c8cc8083d425aaaacfa07" alt=""
6 June 2015 | 4 replies
If the borrower is vacating a residence that will remain occupied by a co-borrower, the borrower is permitted to obtain another FHA insured mortgage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b3d/a7b3d807d91d61ffc831e3700e00ceb62377c28a" alt=""
17 June 2015 | 13 replies
Just totally guessing on your numbers but I would say that if you don't re-invest the money and get at least 20%+ ROI then overall you would remain cash flow negative.2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29002/29002e22996167027c7d2556fd09b34c92cb0632" alt=""
8 July 2013 | 8 replies
Will a 20 percent equity position be enough cushion to remain competitive and successful?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abdc8/abdc89c02db14b2ecb1429bbdf999208cc8e284c" alt=""
19 May 2014 | 7 replies
I can't quite remember, but I think he took the position that he could find the people behind the entities, even if they were trying to remain anonymous.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc28c/cc28c6845e82ecf8c27ecf5802987f0d83087276" alt=""
29 June 2014 | 5 replies
Just to say that you've never done it, inventory is getting thinner, competition for remaining flip deals is higher, margins thinner, and you're not paying cash to get a great deal - but you're also not putting your partner's money and credit at risk?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77530/77530c44b4d646972572fe87b47b72710aec1335" alt=""
4 August 2014 | 10 replies
Does the house remain in the owners name or does the title or deed get transfered to my name.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d42f/4d42f1a59bfa09f339bb5c8a2ea5e2ff6b375b09" alt=""
23 July 2014 | 10 replies
Hence, they remain relatively flat in price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8138f/8138f67b93c2d26c268bc002783a35486be9df3f" alt=""
12 June 2014 | 24 replies
Because the remaining 20% to get from the tenant is very questionable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/164b0/164b020cfd4d902848177622cd781b29a0c60729" alt=""
26 March 2015 | 1 reply
So this post is not for those who oppose this method.My question is when I have an item that is not fully depreciated but becomes obsolete (broken microwave) I have done a journal entry to move the remaining depreciation of the item into a repairs expense account.Do you feel that is the correct procedure?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0f55/e0f552ac37945f5ad3e915e40da95f70c77e7150" alt=""
23 July 2014 | 4 replies
It may need done depending on the length of time and frequency they smoked, and what all they smoked which will remain unknown.