It could be a bit more or a bit less depending on the people involved, obviously, but the 50/50 split seems to be considered fair.However, in my opinion, the way with less complications and less risk/stress for both parties is the fixed interest loan.

That also is a complicated endeavor.

I'm sure it has the potential to get complicated when multiple "sellers" have to make a decision.

I did this last year actually on a second.Another caution here, speaking of just buyer notes, as Dion like to mention "class" there is a difference between loans funded with cash and obligations as paying equities and purchasing equity notes can complicate the flavor as part may become viewed as a cash obligation to a point (when purchased at a discount) and the equity amounts of the unpaid balance.

I'm constantly creating, reviewing and updating complicated spreadsheets and databases.

It's a complicated quirky system.

Double flipping a contract can get complicated with so much paperwork and can eat up the end investor's profit pretty fast.Just my 2 centsMancill

Sounds like based on your experience co-construct will end up being a good fit.Only complaint i've had with any of these companies so far is the overly complicated pricing structures.

Some towns however have their water/garbage/sewer bills follow the land, not the tenant so landlord pays even if utilities are in Tenant's name but not paid.To further complicate matters some counties, and even towns have landlord tenant laws that are different from state law.

Be careful of some of those HOAs as they are often expensive, underfunded or prone to unnecessary harassment (or all three!)