If you do not have a very specific type of property (coverage need exists, meets coverage objectives, able to be zoned/permitted, and you are a willing landlord) you will not be considered.I certainly don't want to discourage you, but also wanted to give you an idea of what you are up against.        

The idea is that while a quit claim will accomplish your legal objectives, it might end up costing you more for a title company to produce another general warranty deed when it comes time to sell.

We are dancing with the owner of a mid-sized multiunit building - trying to find a solution which best serves the Vendor's tax position, while benefitting us - or, at least is not a detriment to our objectives.

don't chase the shiny object.

I've done all three, and they are viable options, but wholesaling is my primary objective but explaining it this way covers my *** in case my buyer doesn't close on time or some other issue comes up.

Each type has it advantages or it's disadvantages, depending on your Investment Goals/objectives.

That is illegal discrimination based on family status.For me the objective would be to get them out.

As you understand them so far, what are your goals, plans and objectives with the asset class?

What kind of objections might a seller have to a non-exclusive option and how would you overcome it?

This policy directly addresses a Seller’s objection to the deal.