I'm a little bit concerned whether that would be considered as unethical or offensive (of course, unethical is too strong a word here - but you get what I mean), just like when you buy a house, the buyer agent does not want you to work with other buyer agents.

They resorted to criminal activity in an effort to get the tenants to move.

In addition to those with certain incomes or credit, you could include criminal histories, pending litigation, etc.I'll ask a devil's advocate question which may or may not stir this pot a whole lot more, but do child molesters, rapist, kiddy porn peddlers, etc. all deserve the same standard of living and attention as those of us who aren't?

If this is his first time and he only has the secondary lien lending to a first time rehabber, I'm just curious if he knows what he's getting into.No offense to you, of course, since you may know exactly what you're doing.

We’ve had 2 applicants this past week, unfortunately, we had to turn both down due to credit issues, and one had a horrendous criminal background.

In the letter tell them that is they don't pay you will be filing in Small Claims Court.BTW- if they have decent credit and not a pure credit criminal you will likely be able to settle the issue and revive payment on the 1st court date thru mediation without it even going further.If they don't show up, then you will receive a Judgment which you then file at the courthouse which will not only show up on their credit, but will at what ever interest is set for that year for your State or County.

Exclusions that may be in a policy would be discrimination, sexual harassment, Intentional/criminal acts on your part. 

Class 3 offenses are the least serious type of misdemeanor crime, but if they are a repeat offender they may not be answering the phone because they are busy for up to 20 days over at the Wake County Detention Center.

Now if it was CRIMINAL Rico that's a whole nother kettle of fish.

App...In all criminal cases, contempt cases, and other cases filed pursuant to this chapter, if a party has sold, leased, or let real estate, the title to which was not in the party when it was offered for sale, lease, or letting, or such party has maintained an office bearing signs that real estate is for sale, lease, or rental thereat, or has advertised real estate for sale, lease, or rental, generally, or describing property, the title to which was not in such party at the time, it shall be a presumption that such party was acting or attempting to act as a real estate broker, and the burden of proof shall be upon him or her to show that he or she was not acting or attempting to act as a broker or sales associate.