This section prescribes rules for tracing debt proceeds to specific expenditures.Treas Reg §1.163-8T(a)(4)Treatment of interest expense(i)General ruleExcept as otherwise provided in paragraph (m) of this section (relating to limitations on interest expense other than the passive loss and nonbusiness interest limitations), interest expense allocated under the rules of this section is treated in the following manner:(A) Interest expense allocated to a trade or business expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(7) of this section) is taken into account under section 163(h)(2)(A);(B) Interest expense allocated to a passive activity expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(4) of this section) or a former passive activity expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section) is taken into account for purposes of section 469 in determining the income or loss from the activity to which such expenditure relates;(C) Interest expense allocated to an investment expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this section) is treated for purposes of section 163(d) as investment interest;(D) Interest expense allocated to a personal expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(5) of this section) is treated for purposes of section 163(h) as personal interest; and(E) Interest expense allocated to a portfolio expenditure (as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section) is treated for purposes of section 469(e)(2)(B)(ii) as interest expense described in section 469(e)(1)(A)(i)(III).Treas Reg §1.163-8T(c)(4)Allocation of debt; proceeds deposited in borrower's account(i)Treatment of depositFor purposes of this section, a deposit of debt proceeds in an account is treated as an investment expenditure, and amounts held in an account (whether or not interest bearing) are treated as property held for investment.

My hope is that the ethical investor will have all their legal paperwork in order and explain any risks to both homeowner and end buyer. 

I and the seller agree - if it was agreed to - then it is fairly simple on a moral/ethical ground - that the buyer deserves the warranty.

As a buyer, I'd almost always prefer the "touch up" or "just replace the plumbing with pex" treatment, especially if it's a pre-war home.My renters (single guys) care way more about things like the height of the shower head and how loud the ceiling fan is than what anything looks like.

NAR/CAR ethics stipulate 'Seller is Agent' disclosure in writing on the MLS etc at time of listing because even if Seller is not the Listing Agent, licensed seller/owner may expect and/or receive compensation (ie, gift, referral fee, portion of listing agent's compensation, etc).Thus licensed seller is inherently not strictly limited to being a principal in the transaction, so would have had to disclose seller is licensed agent. 

These are professionals with additional training and a stricter code of ethics.

No, hiring a lawyer doesn't get you any special treatment by the court or clerks or law enforcement (and if it does, that's several violations of law).

These are professionals with additional training and a stricter code of ethics.

I’m a wholesaler with a real estate license... but I also have ethics and morals so I guess I’m not a wholesaler after all.

If that goal Is best accomplished by sharing this piece of InformatIon, then they can.The National Association of REALTORS Code of Ethics is silent on the disclosure of highest offers specifically, but does say this:Standard of Practice 1-15REALTORS®, in response to inquiries from buyers or cooperating brokers shall, with the sellers’ approval, disclose the existence of offers on the property.