Even by the classic 1% rule (rents should be 1% of purchase price), its $70K overpriced.

Selling burgers is a tool to generate money to do that.  

The toy store owner has customers, the burger joint has customers, an RE agent who doesn't have an agreement to represent someone has a customer, landlords have customers they don't represent a tenant, they don't act on their behalf, they provide a product and service.

You know, if you ran a burger joint, you'd be going to the bank daily or often.

.$4,190,900 Price / 193 Units = $21,715 price / unit.2% rule rents = $4,190,900 / .02 = $83,818, so it slightly exceeds the 2% rule, at 2.08%.Hmmm.

It explains how you learn; you could spent a lifetime "learning" one way and not get anywhere, or you can pinpoint how you learn today and accelerate.They are all great books, "Pitch Anything" and "The 10x Rule" really apply to the entrepreneurial side of getting what you want in life, "7 Habits" and "How to Win..." is how to get the life you want, and FLIP is really good basics on the what to look for in rehabbing.

Just finished Nasar's book called flipping houses like burgers.  

My MIL is only getting 4k/month in rental income... for a burger king!

Flip burgers.

I presented it in front of the Bay Area Investors Education Services investors group in San Francisco and a husband-wife group of investors and I negotiated the contract at Burger King. :-) How did you finance this deal?