I asked him about the surveillance camera he said he doesn't want it anymore, the camera is still wired and I'm concerned that he may be still monitoring my activity on the driveway since the camera can be connected to his phone.

I have similar problems with our plumbing and construction customers where customers negotiate, agree to a deal and then try to change the deal so they for something selfish that benefits them and with no concern or regards for your welfare. 

As far as I'm concerned, this measure is unenforceable without that process defined and the agency staffed to handle it.

That would be really bad and your STR revenue would be the least of your concerns.

The main concern is emergency exit in the case of fire.

That would be double dipping.I think the bigger concern would be the management company's lack of transparency in breaking down the revenue/expenses, and whether that means they are possibly rent shifting (offering lower nightly rates that they rev split with you and shifting the cost into various administrative fees that they keep 100% of).IE instead of$500nt x 4 nights = $2000, they take 16% of $2000 so you get $1680They might be doing something like (and this is typical of PM companies trying to squeeze out an extra buck)...$400nt x 4 nights = $1600+$400 in "administrative fees" = $2000.You get 84% of $1600 = $1344Same rent cost for the customer but now they are only paying you 84% on $1600 instead of $2000, and then pocketing the entire $400 "administrative fee".

Are you concerned about the PMC doing the rehab to improve the property?

The last thing is to hire Steve Michelini as a Consultant to represent your concern to the City and try to get a small reduction for one year...good luck. 

The thing that is concerning to me is that if you are under the age of 59 1/2 you will be penalized for taking the funds out too early.

My main concern with house hacking is our income will be reduced quiet a bit and we won’t be able to save as much for the next property.