Pros I can think of: - higher rent rates (renting by the room) - saving cost and time on upgrade - easier advertising Cons I can think of: - high turnovers  - limited screening - possible wear and tear  

We all understand you want to save on fees and have the lowest rate.

Want to access equity but don't want to take on a higher rate.

Wholesalers or sellers will advertise, it just depends if the numbers make sense to you.

But I would not recommend MF right now - they have overbuilt new MF here in Huntsville, and vacancy rate in MF is becoming problematic. 

Alternatively, I could hope that my next assignment will be in a better market with more options, maybe lower rates, and more cash on hand.Should I accept that no market is perfect and get in the game now, or hold out for a year to enter a potentially better market with more capital to invest?

Please elaborate on why each is essential and how they contribute to a company's overall performance and reliability.Similarly, provide a list of red flags or negative traits that indicate a subpar or potentially problematic property management company, with explanations on how these might negatively impact my real estate operations.Create a scoring or rating system that I can use to objectively evaluate and compare each property management company based on the traits and skills identified earlier.

That will make all the difference in the rates.

Given the current statement of market, interest rate, good turnkey providers , house prices etc…, would you choose memphis or alabama market to invest in real estate.

Wholesaler advertised it as all tenants paying and on time.