The $100,000 unit shouldn't cost as much as the $300,000 unit to maintain.It is not worth debating the 50% rule.

I am not really looking for a debate of the specific formulas or specific details.

Its been six months since I looked at it in detail, and the law was under debate at the time.

It is not worth debating.

Of course that may be a bigger nightmare than I'm willing to take on, considering the zoning and planning and fire resuscitation avenues I probably have not properly considered.I'm still debating what I would offer this guy, and whether I should do it at all.

Maybe it was just too small of a recession in the US.If we want to debate central banks and fiat money we can do so but that would not be a discussion really on topic.As someone who thinks there are serious problems yet is aggressively expanding your RE portfolio what are you doing to hedge or otherwise protect your position?

Well this one is debatable.

I stay away from words or comments that can become debatable… i.e.

Debating if it makes sense to buy primary residence first, or focus on investing first.

During one of the debates someone asked if age should be a concern, He said "I refuse to make an issue out of my opponents youth and inexperience" - That one line ended the issue of whether he was too old.