Apparently now those investments are less interesting to city hall. 

Quote from @Devin James: In one of our development projects, the City staff asked us to remove 40 units from our concept plan.This wasn’t requested by the City Commission at a formal hearing, it was the opinion of the staff.Our original concept already proposed fewer units than the current zoning would have allowed.Here’s what erasing 40 units means:- 40 fewer homes for buyers- Over $1M in lost profit for our team- Fewer tax dollars and impact fees that could’ve benefited the City’s infrastructure & servicesWe gotta get betterEveryone wants more affordable housing, but not everyone wants to do what it takes to achieve it NIMBY is what it boils down to.

This week, the City of Jacksonville Municipal Court ruled in favor of PadSplit, voiding citations for "illegal boarding houses" on constitutional and fair housing grounds.This marks a huge victory in expanding affordable housing solutions while navigating legal challenges.

Before you get too far, get with the city/county and make sure everything is copacetic. 

However, after waiting and testing again, the backup reoccurred.At this point, the plumber snaked the line from the cleanout towards the city’s main sewer line.

Companies are unlikely to consider cities with high crime or cities with high operating costs.You will need multiple properties to replace your current income.

Quote from @Min Zhang: Cincinnati is one of my favorite cities to live in Ohio.

Hunter puts on one for hotels in Atlanta every year.Another idea that might work is find out if there are any CCIM classes or combination of classes going on in the cities where you want to work. 

With the city contemplating expanding the ADU ability to city wide, is there any benefit to doing a rezoning now (assuming successful) before the citywide expansion takes place?

While I can imagine some cities might be against "boarding houses" or enforce their "brothel law" I can't imagine too many cities would be supportive of it.