Logic would dictate you'd have to be marketing prior to close if you were utilizing a double closing and transnational funding etc.  

As the economy is a semi-independent/semi-world economy (independent economies dependent upon DEEP trans-national inter connections) various iterations of this are likewise playing out globally as well. 

@John Clark all of your points about info sharing, while correct in their conceptual execution (except for the idea that AirBnB is the only party to have transnational info, the renter and property owner do too), hinge upon the idea that AirBnB has any duty to share that information with the government, that the government can't get that information any other way to enforce its regulations, and that the government has a need for the information if they can't get it anywhere else.

Subtract from this all of your holding/transnational/rehab costs - this is step 2.4.

And now, being trans-national corporations, we are now entering what I call "The Python Economy".

Transnation Title has been amazing in lansing!

You may want to begin networking with a hard money lender and or transnational lender who would be willing to offer up the funds you need to close on your deal, then immediately sell it(double close).  

I know the Reg A+ have only been around since 2015 so there my not be the largest sample size, but I'm curious if you have seen any trends in the structure that differentiate crowdfunding from transnational syndication, other than the obvious required ones.

What I distill from your posts is they must be very profitable for you to have gained so much experience in this area by putting up with that kind of risk and transnational abuse. - Jay

See the other thread (http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/93/topics/162355-why-is-everyone-using-transnational-funding-you-dont-need-it?