data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2349/c23495629891b11c24c395328d57e862813f8f3d" alt=""
24 February 2025 | 94 replies
I think the more skin the buyer has in the game the better off the seller would be. but a $100K note with $6500 to reinstate and $15K in repairs?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ea8/f3ea8983c74c06b763887b2d76c2d4e9f2ffd6c7" alt=""
30 December 2024 | 8 replies
Note that I do not put a lot of time into due diligence until the "contract to hold" meeting, when they put some skin in the game.At the "contract to hold" meeting, I collect an amount equal to one month's rent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461e9/461e96efefac6768e667e1e2b4e326dd8c3b8ded" alt=""
2 January 2025 | 37 replies
As a 3rd-party real estate consultant that has no skin in the game other than what I charge, I provide exactly what you've described—unbiased, no-nonsense, and straightforward advice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b3ad/8b3add3cc8622c33d4b0f270bd4ef8c5e7792950" alt=""
9 January 2025 | 116 replies
The lenders simply are not interested in financing a deal where the buyer has such a small amount of skin in the game.If you don't mind, can you touch on how you were able to obtain the type of financing structure that allowed for a seller-held 2nd mortgage?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad8c/cad8c225ab053c17ba8293b547372abe299850be" alt=""
3 January 2025 | 42 replies
I have not reviewed BAM's fees but it's likely based on their representation of UNDER 10% "skin in the game" that most of their "investment" is taken from fees deducted from the money gamblers place with them and counted as equity in the deal; this is a common practice in the syndication industry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65c2e/65c2e916e37f14f680971d005671dde5f4dfddf3" alt=""
20 December 2024 | 1 reply
Many sellers will not accept this since they are in second position, and it is very risky since if you default (higher probability for investors with no money and/or no skin in the game), they will most likely be wiped out during a foreclosure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5941/d594128e82065eced1400cfd231846978f0421d9" alt=""
18 December 2024 | 3 replies
Quote from @Chris Seveney: @Francisco AvancenaThere are specific lenders who will do land dealsBut of course not as many as traditional real estate.The key will be skin in the game - typically for land because it is less liquid than a home the lender will want to have a lower ltv on the deal I fund land flippers currently in CO FLA WA ID MT NV AZ OR TX SC GA VA one thing about land though LTV is lower and RATES are NOT the same as typical HML rates are higher for raw land but its a specialty niche and a business that I grew up in..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cace/2cace435730bfa6241e3033e60db5a34b59f83ff" alt=""
22 December 2024 | 7 replies
Unfortunately most lack the balance sheet to obtain favorable financing, can't afford to put any skin in the game and fail to make a compelling reason for why the investment makes sense or to justify the structure they are seeking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ee20/6ee20d8aed5bc9aee05f9ca16f1afe357f05669d" alt=""
31 December 2024 | 66 replies
With this scenario we both have skin in the game: His work and my materials.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8bc0/e8bc0527b77c3855d83bfde7f222d41c25762d06" alt=""
11 February 2025 | 1681 replies
They have more skin in the game then you do.Make sure you get clear title.