At most, I can see companies (for both retail and office) gradually reducing their overall footprint.

Which we're told we will get back between year 1-2 and use as a capital return to our investors thereby reducing our total capital investment and increasing our investors returns. 

@Antonio Williams @Marlen WeberYou may want to reach out to the HR department of your employer.Your retirement fund admin may allow loans against your vested 401K balance.There are normally 2 loan provisionsGeneral & Home purchaseHome purchase loan provision allows for a longer pay-back period.Normally loans are not added to your income and not subject to taxes/penalties.Your future paychecks are reduced to pay-back the loan balance.There are also potential risks when taking a 401K loan, the balance being due upon being let go or quitting.Alternatively, this year cause of the cares act, you may potentially be able to take out a distribution(no requirement to pay back) and it wouldn't be subject to penalties.

Are there any other ways to reduce the risk of keeping multi unit properties under my personal name?

But as a first time buyer, it seems the risk would be significantly reduced. 

So if you get prequalified for 80% LTV.....but your property needs 85% LTV to BUY and REHAB....and you want to keep your out of pocket at $0....then maybe we should reduce our initial offer by 5% so you BUY and REHAB at 80%. 

I am no longer able to vend so my business has been reduced by 60%.

So similar to the turnover costs, it depends where you take the expense but if taking it in vacancy then that would result in increased vacancy cost, but reduced PM costs. 

It sounds like the numbers work as it cashflows if you don't live in it and you are reducing your current rental expenses.

The seller originally listed for $795k but has reduced 4 times in past 90 days to $685k.