I think you are out of luck but I could be wrong.The risk of something going wrong for the attorney versus the nominal fee they make on the deal is not worth getting sanctioned or losing their livelihood.You say everything will be fine but the minute something goes South with your property the attorney whether they should be blamed or not will become the target and be sued.People in the business a long time attorneys, real estate brokers know what to engage in and what to stay away from for transacting business.

Since I have engaged their services to revamp my site and optimize it monthly 7 months ago my leads and lead quality have increased about 50%.

They do not usually get them once a Buyer is engaged and most buyers would not agree to allow a Seller to conduct due diligence for them.

At the same time I refinanced, I got back in contact with the architect I was using before and re-engaged his services.

Be sure to be as active and engaging as possible.

From my practice I can make the advise to use the 1C:Enterprice software: http://risebiz.co.za/1c-enterprise/ This software is very popular between accountants in Russian and Ukraine because it is very easy in use because you can use the already adjusted configurations as for selling or for stocks it is the complete solution for automatization of accounting and tax accounting in organizations engaged in any commercial activity.

Might be because of my approach to business dealings and experience that makes me feel immune to most matters others can't sleep with, I try to think before engaging mouth and I never provide anything in writing with thought.

I feel the same way and appreciate your points and your willingness to engage.  

One last thing is always think about the economies of scale you should be able to capture if you are working or engaging with a quality or well organized turnkey provider.

Using an arrest record without a conviction is being viewed as discriminating against a consumer who has not been found guilty of having done anything illegal.Per the new guidance:Exclusions Because of Prior Arrest.....A housing provider with a policy or practice of excluding individuals because of one or more prior arrests (without any conviction) cannot satisfy its burden of showing that such policy or practice is necessary to achieve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest.  .....As the Supreme Court has recognized, “[t]he mere fact that a man has been arrested has very little, if any, probative value in showing that he has engaged in any misconduct.