data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aece/8aece37f6fe4ec0fb0ab468bda1c5ea462ea9717" alt=""
6 April 2015 | 21 replies
If you are located in a stable market with no population loss predicted in the next decade (us census has very detailed and very educated forecasting models for most zip codes)then each month your tenant pays down your mortgage will count as money in your pocket.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759d4/759d490744f5e6d6a9bb6eb01a43cf8c0ade4f70" alt=""
16 May 2015 | 41 replies
Hi @Arthur Zaragoza - we live & invest in Kansas City using precisely the model you describe. 70 to 75% LTV is what you will see for investment properties, and we have found banks that will do loans for as little as 50k (would probably need to appraise for at least 72k).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e00d6/e00d64950bdb226844671d0c200e76dc911d0ccf" alt=""
4 March 2015 | 7 replies
Not giving advice one way or the other, but to my knowledge--based on my experiences--be careful about this model; someone else please correct me if I'm wrong.
3 May 2015 | 16 replies
Obviously I have no expertise in this arena.. so my next step is to find an attorney who specializes in commercial real estate with development & retail experience?..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad001/ad0019644c9dd068c48252d0a8616da1868536cd" alt=""
6 July 2018 | 28 replies
Depending on what kind of architecture practice you want to have, it could help your expertise as well as your own finances.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66bb7/66bb796fd777fb676cfbab0af1cb9cb3f98084cb" alt=""
25 February 2015 | 2 replies
Flat fee model, which I think is great for this strong rental market. [email protected]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbedb/fbedbc0a269b41c00f9ba5ca6f7baac254be2e9d" alt=""
29 June 2019 | 55 replies
Its working for now but time will tell if we keep this model or mix in more contractors if this doesn't make sense cost wise in the future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a59d0/a59d06a608e753a6f39f7bcce5c88a8515acca35" alt=""
27 February 2015 | 10 replies
The only rule of thumb that I use is one that is built by my model for the area that I am evaluating at the time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2e/cfd2e6b891632dc54e3b14ec92cd8f138394a2c2" alt=""
26 February 2015 | 3 replies
The buy and hold and the buy and rehab models are very different, especially when talking about tax computations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71cc1/71cc1ae59548863858d4e2c348d9feab95d8251c" alt=""
2 March 2015 | 16 replies
i just dont see the 'hesitation' to check up on your PM's work periodically. they are a contractor and ur agent which you do not SUPERVISE on a daily basis but likewise any owner who does not evaluate the service of their PM is likely to be lumpable with the slew of slumlords out there who just care about the $ not their tenants.and what better, simple way to check up on ur PM's work by askin a few questions of 1 model tenant?!