What I have a problem with is people representing something they are not in the deal and misleading all the parties involved.

So, you shouldn't be fighting with an agent at all, only their broker (and you probably shouldn't be fighting with the broker either).Second, you only pay a commission if the deal is closed (there are some edge cases where you'd technically owe a commission on a deal that's not consummated, but those would involve you not living up to an executed agreement, which you never had with the buyer the first time around).Third, if an agent/broker has an issue with a buyer breaching an agency relationship, that is between the broker and the buyer, not the seller.

Share the wealth and work involved.

That appears to be paying cash, so there is no debt service involved here.

A few title companies mentioned that they didn't want to get involved in these transactions and risk going to jail.

Im guessing he should be involved in every step of the way, huh?

Perhaps the Drug Task Force folks if they exist in the area or Narcotics, not just the patrol guys...someone more interested in making a bust.

To the best of my understanding it would involve payroll and all the paperwork involved with it, ie taxes etc.If I were you...

I have been involved in real estate casually for several years, always as a side thing as related to our family goals at the time.

But if it's a sub 2 deal, I like to make an appearance to make sure everyone is on the same page and fully understanding what we're doing.Also, if it was a particularly good deal for all involved, I might come snap a picture or two and gather some good feedback for the "testimonials" page on my site and/or newsletter.