I called several tenant/landlord lawyers for their free consultations to ask their opinion and what I can win with and their fees. 

When you exit a deal, what normally ends up happening (like Tom Brady keep winning more Super Bowls) is that you go into two more deals (with now double the amount of capital) and you will likely find that with those new K1s you could result in you having way more passive losses you began with If you can see where this is going... yes, experienced investors with a lot of capital deployed might have 500k-1M+ suspended passive losses and have not paid taxes in years and do not appear to pay taxes for years!

Before retirement, with high W2 income, at one point, my deductions wouldn't be capped if I was professional, so you win some, you lose some.My CPA was very helpful when it came to depreciation though.

This process is a safe-guard to insure that the deal in question is a win/win.

Ive learned to look for a) the ones that dont look like husband and wife where the survivor is still living at the property and make sure none of the admistrators are living at the property. b) To look instantly for the ones that have real estate listed as assets c) The ones that don't have a lot of people listed as heirs.

When I think of customer no service, instantly B of A pops up.

Sounds like a win-win.  

If there is a way I want to create a win-win for him/his heirs and myself that would be appealing to him to do a deal like this.this is not my expertise as you can probably tell but I'm thankful for any input from the pros. thanks! 

Account Closed I'm instantly fascinated by your mention of sober living housing.

Everyone wins.