Too much tenant volatility.

However, I have seen some articles about people pushing to limit vacation rentals in town along the lines of Santa Barbara so I didn't want to base my calculations on something that appears to be a little more volatile.  

Investor B had to use $666,667 of capital to get his/her return.So even if the extra cash made no money or just getting like 0.1% in a savings/money market account tied to your business checking investor A did better.That being said you have to have the stomach for the volatility and if I were investor A I would try to figure out what I did wrong with my projections to get those losers. 

Not sure if this is an effective risk assessment, but feel like it's safer than chasing the highest cashflows in potentially volatile markets.

Also, with real estate, these market fluctuations aren't nearly as volatile as the stock market.

If you want something that generates passive income with little effort beyond cutting a check, much like a dividend stock but with less volatility, then consider using a turnkey outfit.Full disclosure, I am the CEO of Spartan Invest.

Once the PV system is installed, you effectively have eliminated any volatility for part of your electric expenses on the building.

*HMM Sounds more like Day Trading . . . my rentals are not that volatile So everyone reading - do you accurate your balance sheet?

If i were to accept bitcoin i would put a massive spread on the value of receiced coin to hedge against volatility. i own bitcoin but havemt tried to sell any yet so i dont knoe how liquid it is, but depending in liquidity, id tell the renter each btc is 1800-2300 (market -2750). 

"Yes I know it isn't impossible" 1.5% does seem attainable fairly regularly.My question for all of the landlords out there is which of the above 2 scenarios would you prefer. 2% and possibly volatile or less than 2% with "hopefully" less volatility.Also any native to Nashville that may know more than me please feel free to chime in.