At least a couple years ago when I researched it, there was absolutely no case law supporting it.I think its RESPA 2608 that states the buyer has the right to choose the title company, and the seller is liable for up to 3 times the price of the title policy if they don't allow the buyer to choose.Most people including realtors don't know or follow this law.

Where are you from Edwinreiloans4u and what do you currently do as a full time profession and why do you wish to make the change to real estate investing and how do you think you will make the change to real estate investing from your current profession which will enable you to support yourself during the transistion to real estate investing?

Also if you purchase a property with high vacancy, one in which the income doesn't support the holding expense, is it worth considering a buy and hold until the vacancy is resolved to get back to black?

thank you everybody for all of your support and advice.

Any wisdom or assistance is welcome, or even just the support.

Ultimately what matters is the value of the building - if you have enough to support/justify your treatment of the amount at issue - go with that.

What evidence do you have to support your unfounded hearsay? 

Unless the housing is supported by government subsidies a builder or developer can do anything they want.

JasonThanks for the support and I am sure all of those mentioned will agree with me when I say "It is better to give than to receive"!

I posted a reply to this poor lady that was evident that she was having a hard time getting support from the program and her family was VERY unsupportive.