![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/91020/small_1694949680-avatar-gjohnson94.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 January 2016 | 33 replies
I could listen to all of the naysayers talk about what they expected and didn’t get, but that’s not how you win.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/35038/small_1621367776-avatar-bienesraices.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 December 2011 | 9 replies
The tenant that left should simply try to coax his deposit from the other two, or the one moving in.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/35038/small_1621367776-avatar-bienesraices.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 December 2011 | 10 replies
As a buyer, it doesn't make sense for me to spend $300 on an inspection and have you the wholesaler write a contract with someone else before I can submit my contract.What is happening in our market, is wholesalers aren't allowing inspections, want a non-refundable deposit, and in Bienes case, a large one (this is assuming that it is a lower cost property).Is there a solution that creates a win/win for both parties?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/75460/small_1621415059-avatar-golsf.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 December 2011 | 4 replies
Once I did some shopping around and found a broker and insurance carrier offering good rates, I've simply renewed each year with the carrier.This year, the broker notified us that one of the lenders (WFB), who has a fractional interest in one of the four units, is demanding that we double our liability coverage.Given that the lender is not paying the premium, and that they only half a partial stake in 1 of the 4 units in the building, what legal rights do they have to compel the HOA to seek out a higher premium and double liability coverage?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/86281/small_1621416251-avatar-cwilson.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 July 2012 | 9 replies
So stopping here, I would already say we are at a win.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/5343/small_1621347386-avatar-travise1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 May 2014 | 80 replies
You win as I'm short and WAS extremely fat.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/88431/small_1621416469-avatar-harveymasons.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 December 2011 | 5 replies
I understand how the process works but my question is this:If a person wins a bid for a tax lien and owner doesn't pay the lien in the specified time you can start the foreclosure process.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/90063/small_1694732813-avatar-houseman2.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 December 2011 | 2 replies
Real Estate Services do have specific definitions, and usually involve those things required to effect the sale of the property, not just bringing buyer and seller together.If, as a bird dog, you are simply finding a property and bringing it to the attention of someone else, and not involved with negotiations, or "performing real estate services," that are needed to actually transfer property from seller to buyer, there are no laws against that.If I'm wrong, here, I'd love to read the statute that requires a license to say "Hey, Joe Investor, there's a vacant house on 13th Street.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/91350/small_1621416600-avatar-marknolan.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 December 2011 | 31 replies
Then as more time passes the less interest they have in buying...He's playing a nasty game...Sadly, he's winning...I'm trying to think of a way to sell with the MINIMAL amount of involvement on his part...Maybe sell the place and then AFTER the sale, then tell the new owners to call him...I'm getting tired of this...
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/35046/small_1621367782-avatar-hasemann.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 December 2011 | 10 replies
I think their issue is that they view my initial loan with my aunt as a cash out refi because the HUD settlement statement says I paid cash for the purchase.I tried explaining that I paid with my aunt's cash that was loaned to me - as evidenced by the mortgage note - so it was not a cash out but they simply don't want to budge.What is frustrating is that they had the original HUD settlement for over 2 months and never said it was an issue.