data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d45e8/d45e8f08ea280592465ffd75e6ea7a2f16bb4010" alt=""
23 May 2016 | 18 replies
Or the foreclosing party would have cleared it before auctioning, or will clear them off before giving the title to auction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dade/3dadec3c255909d22df416fd7b48cb1bbc6bfaf5" alt=""
25 May 2016 | 11 replies
The tenant and her 2 young kids live in a one bedroom apartment and the 3 of them all appear on the lease, which is currently month-to-month with 30 days written notice by either party (landlord or tenant).We recently learned that the tenant's husband has moved into the apartment and he is not noted on the lease or any other documents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7d66/b7d66eda485d936a800b5437a41fad1dc4f6fd13" alt=""
4 June 2016 | 65 replies
@Sean Cole I was not directing my comments at you specifically, and if you are providing value for those investors who are buying MLS deals from you, I am happy for both parties!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dee3/9dee32dc7a6cc542063fafa3ae1d8e36ceb7da9e" alt=""
26 May 2016 | 6 replies
What I understand to be the biggest difference is the bank that gives the loan maintains responsibility of the loan and doesn't sell to a third party.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac750/ac7501eee2c16e36ebfd50d6599555a51212abc7" alt=""
28 May 2016 | 2 replies
Actually, not sure if that last part is true - can someone here with knowledge of foreclosure confirm if the seller's record is clear if the sale is avoided?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e241f/e241f40324cfdcc3dcffcb71391be7643a4b2e85" alt=""
26 May 2016 | 6 replies
I have seen a lot of foreclosure auctions where the HOA has already foreclosed on a property that is eventually sold to a 3rd-party for the HOA Liens.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9fe1/b9fe1d50e4216910c82dcbbe0a07edbad3fbfdf5" alt=""
25 May 2016 | 1 reply
yeah you DEFINITELY take prorated dollar amount for the extra 7 days and then set the new move dates with both parties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66be9/66be996cf90983e27ccaed5845d80e51c1ded4ca" alt=""
27 May 2016 | 11 replies
A couple of follow up questions:1) Are inspections completed by a city inspector or a 3rd party and are there any expenses associated with that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/774bb/774bbae478c351cfdf29fd914c16c452ef098c4d" alt=""
28 July 2016 | 7 replies
@Aryelle Collins I'm late to this party, but you should be able to just use listsource.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a3ae/9a3ae2da51d642d5e372f5a4b738650aebb3e365" alt=""
19 November 2016 | 8 replies
Not because of anything she did but rather another party to the transaction.