There is no logic to why they wait other than word from above to move a particular asset.  

Now however if you have worked hard and built a network of people in Real Estate by the value you have provided then you will have a lot better understanding of who you want to invest your money with which is better than the dart at the dartboard logic that so many people seem to use when it comes to spending money on Real Estate education. 

The logic is simple.

How much of our investment decisions (or any decisions, since most decisions could be construed as investment related) is due to emotion and how much to logic?   

Or are there so many false assumptions in my logic that my argument is a pile of dookie?

I'm just curious about the logic of seeing the deals available and if they are, why you'd think they're homeruns if the buyers of the end product are likely drying up? 

From there on out your job is to reinforce that first impression emotionally and logically.

The one in question above is moving to Texas...As far as leaving crap behind making it harder for them to get future housing, this is also a logical fallacy.

The logic is that servicing companies know all the rules and this will mitigate legal risk. 

I am amazed that the bank's asset protection departments seem to have no clue what is going on with their properties.In my opinion, the banks are too overwhelmed to listen to such obvious logic and business acumen.