Trada's pattern of developments and unfulfilled obligations appear to justify the DA persuing Trada's principals for Fraud.

As you know, the rules have changed and stated income is now frowned upon.Now that I've completely bored you with the back story, let me get to the FUN part (all caps means I'm being sarcastic!)

Does that strategy satisfy the "no comingling" rule?

Please read and follow the special rules for that forum, or your posts will be removed.

_r=1&ex=1367121600&en=20afd35f8291bee0&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=sloginBanks and brokers are not happy with proposed changes to their lending rules.

A general rule of thumb is over time expenses go 40-50% of rental income.

The rule of thumb is that expenses will consume about 50% of the rent.

I am following one piece of property in particular. Did some negotiating while it was in short sale but nothing came of it. Now the bank owns it outright, has it listed on MLS and there is a real estate agent assigned...

As of wednedsay conforming rules requier the oner to be on title for 6 months before they refi.

Not saying appraisers are intentionally inaccurate (though there have been incidents of that), but that its impossible to know which of multiple available comps truly represent the market.I'd be extremely leery if a seller says "here's an appraisal that justifies my price".