It would probably be best for you bottom line (and for the purposes of securing a loan!)

@Alan Eisenberg -- If you're looking at spending $1.5m-2.0m, with 30% down you should be able to secure a property that is between $5m and approximately $6.7m.

He said that this way, we could secure 20 homes using conventional lending this way instead of 10. 10 in the person with the higher score's name first while the other builds their credit back and then switch.Is this a common strategy? 

But the bottom line is they were using the D class assets as the base of their collateral or talking investors into buying them.. they raised a good amount of money through Alternative investment securities brokers mainly guys that rip people off selling high priced annuities.. 

They do all the work of marketing and securing the off markets deals.

Think of all the things that could go wrong and see if the lease addresses them: unauthorized pets or tenants, early termination, security deposit, lease violations, late rent, eviction, lawn maintenance, parking, etc.5.

I am offering the limited partners a preferred return plus 50/50 of the financial benefit in the property, I.e. the cash flows, appreciation, and depreciation benefits.How do I keep it so that I am the only personal guarantor while keeping my investors interest secured in the property?

The Community will suffer the most because the new law forbids buyers from moving in, renovating, securing, or even fixing a roof leak on these houses.

Can I ask who your rep was at NBKC and what rate of financing you were able to secure?

That’s the main benefit from pooling our money together, the fact that we can get access to deals that the average real estate investor can’t secure due to lack of funding.