I don't put as much weight on national, state, or even city trends unless it's a small city.

The outcome shows that your "pretty through vetting process" has been weighted, measured, and found wanting. 

...More importantly, my investment properties more than cover the mediocre financial performance of my home... so, I let my investments carry the weight, and I just sit back and enjoy my home for what it is!...

As the window gets bigger the glass is also thicker, adding to costs and especially weight.

If you have enough cash flowing properties which can carry the weight of this property should an event cause it to go from cash neutral to cash negative and you want to speculate on future appreciation or rising rents, I think the answer lies in your risk tolerance and end goals (don't you love the it depends BP answers). 

The average floor (section) weighted around 10,000lbs or less and the list goes onBut whence getting into it here's what we finally had to do:That's not to mention the caustic and carcinogenic materials and chemicals i.e. formaldehyde and asbestos used in the particle board sub flooring, countertops, insulation and ceiling materials, etc.

After reading more closely I see that the HTML issue was the address, not the body.

Some people seem to have bodies that crave a lot of heat. 

How you weight that portfolio largely depends on what's most important to you.I own ten properties in Detroit, two of which are duplexes.

I'm not too concerned about using up my cash or borrowing capacity - would it be reasonable for me to put less weight on cap rate, and more weight on the return I get from what cash I actually out lay?