I initially wanted to leave a sustainable business to my kids.

You've probably heard of big Landlords losing property, but only because they were flagrantly violating Fair Housing, running a slum, or otherwise violating the law in an egregious manner.

I might think the tenant has poor manners in a situation like that but I wouldn't feel aggrieved in any way since they are just my customer not my friend.

We've had a sustainable 'luxury' househack we raised our family in for the last 17 years and counting. 

@Roger VerasteguiEnvironmentally friendly and affordable usually dont go hand in hand, as the more sustainable products are typically more expensive.One product that is starting to gain more traction in the US (like many of these products, it has been used in Europe for the last 30+ years with great success) is CLT, or cross-laminated timber construction.

Some of that information is at With $50,000 you can buy 3 Properties in 2024 – These are the Best Marketshttps://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/311/topics/1166342-with...You can have multiple locations fairly quickly, we explain how, and then you can market to traveling nurses & professionals in a very profitable manner. 

Ugh, all these guys needed to do was do the work in a timely manner and get paid.

Can your income sustain the loss and when will it cash flow? 

Anyway given the huge amount of supply coming up in the area, you can’t afford a bad location or « bad » property if you want to get rented on a sustainable basis in my humble opinion.I would only get something like that if I wanted to use the property for myself only and want to be on the middle of nowhere.Hope this helps and sorry if I involuntarily poop the party but, at the risk of repeating myself from previous posts you can’t expect to buy by anything in Tulum and make or not lose money.

Florida video voyeurism law:810.145 Video voyeurism(1) As used in this section, the term:(c) “Place and time when a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means a place and time when a reasonable person would believe that he or she could fully disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that the person’s undressing was being viewed, recorded, or broadcasted by another, including, but not limited to, the interior of a residential dwelling, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth.(2) A person commits the offense of video voyeurism if that person:(a) For his or her own amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing another person, intentionally uses or installs an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, who is dressing, undressing, or privately exposing the body, at a place and time when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy;(b) For the amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit of another, or on behalf of another, intentionally permits the use or installation of an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, who is dressing, undressing, or privately exposing the body, at a place and time when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; or(c) For the amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit of oneself or another, or on behalf of oneself or another, intentionally uses an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record under or through the clothing being worn by another person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that person.(5) This section does not apply to any:(a) Law enforcement agency conducting surveillance for a law enforcement purpose;(b) Security system when a written notice is conspicuously posted on the premises stating that a video surveillance system has been installed for the purpose of security for the premises;(c) Video surveillance device that is installed in such a manner that the presence of the device is clearly and immediately obvious; It sounds like the OP's situation may not be covered.