It's not that I don't trust her, but like human beans, she has her biases, good points and not so good points.

I was wondering what you guys thought about this idea.Also, since he is going to be living with them, is he allowed to discriminate based on age or gender and find someone he might have more in common with?

My bias would be to agree a note with specific terms and then have the borrower provide a mortgage.

Just offering an opposing viewpoint.My husband and I are both Realtors and a team.We both "share" the non-gendered identity of Malok for internet purposes.I do agree though, that if someone wanted to actually conduct a transaction with another person in this forum, they would provide their relevant information in some form or fashion.

I maybe biased, but I'm a big fan his works.

Best to do so in the order that people applied and not out of order.If you start using a gut feel and they want to sue (race, religion, gender discrimination) telling the judge that you had a bad feeling but you do not have a consistent process is not going to work.Better might be to have a property manager who you pay to screen prospects and who will know the lawyers in the metro area.

I am obviously biased looking at this as an investor.

Maybe it is reading all the horror stories of residential property managers that has had me biased against them.

As you noted IRR is bias towards early exits so use MIRR as a comparison.One last point that has little to do with IRR.IRR tells you when to sell if you can re-invest the cash.

Just a disclosure about myself being biased.