Given the abatement option could you continue to occupy 15% of the building with commercial tenants while the rest of the building is converted or is that a logistical nightmare/ideally are you seeking different long term commercial tenants if you go that route? 

I also purchased a multi-parcel farm property in TN where the trust who owned the property was out of money and needed cash to continue. 

New to real estate but possess a deep understanding of the responsibilities to continue to gain knowledge and remain loyal with my clients and professionally with my colleagues.  

I will continue the journey in this thread!  

It's all about who is dumb enough to continue to pay that kind of money for a system that already gouges people in a way that even the Gambino family would disapprove of. 

The departing tenant says she will continue paying rent, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Deed holder is almost always named because its the easiest party to find...deed's are recorded and public.It also sounds like the Wyoming LLC is the deed holder and the transactional costs associated with re-titling the real estate is likely going to be more expensive than continuing to maintain the Wyoming LLC.

This could create a disdain for flipping properties and not continuing on the path..The other option could be wholesaling it to start a path to build a war chest to go out and do the first flip with your own money down. 

Even with multiple units, with current interest rates and a competitive market (prices have continued to rise even with higher interest rates) think the Madison market is a stronger long term ownership strategy, where the bulk of your return will come when you sell from appreciation in rents and property value. 

I changed my strategy from 2 years ago of acquiring more doors and "cash flow" to now looking at the asset if I continue to buy.