data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3163/c31639dc7db7f3495ed03e8d8479353c1ab8a89b" alt=""
21 November 2008 | 18 replies
However there is some speculation that the paper gold markets may dislocate due to the lack of underlying physical supporting these markets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e040/8e04076367a38c7872ccf0bb022ee7dbbcf11b7a" alt=""
22 November 2008 | 6 replies
Getting started is simple if you take it a step at a time.....If you have any questions....feel free to contact me anytime.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2319a/2319a5e83d900f969b7e9816da73ec0dc330f2cb" alt=""
16 November 2008 | 7 replies
Sorry such a simple question caused such controversy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76f07/76f07642c8602b27a3faf0272f4b401605623810" alt=""
17 November 2008 | 12 replies
No...there are labor costs in the tearoff (most physically demanding part of the job) and the upfront costs of the ordered shingles that are delivered on-site at your property in addition to dumpster rental that is charged at a higher rate because the weight of shingles only allow 1/2 a dumpster to be filled and the costs of laying down the tar paper immediately after the tearoff is complete as you can not just leave sheathing exposed to the elements while you wait for the next check.With 1/3 upfront, the truth is the contractor is out of pocket by day 2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bd0e/8bd0e2d1006532bc69288bbf0dabd1096c1f9fd7" alt=""
8 January 2009 | 46 replies
It seems most times when someone is explaining their method behind obtaining REOs they go into great lengths about different calculations in hopes of making something so simple seem harder than what it is...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe9f2/fe9f2d1e816cd20803b1ba0d5b30735001fa7be6" alt=""
21 March 2010 | 17 replies
I also kind of think it would be easier than dealing with the $13/hr employees who call themselves Loss Mitigators who are really just paper pushers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d85b/5d85bc414864fed77c7741803d798992a902f3a0" alt=""
3 March 2010 | 8 replies
The building itself is structurally in pretty good shape, its a standard two sided roof structure (i'm not good with the names yet) which a fairly simple layout inside.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ab33/6ab33ffe49edaa9c51f5782c0aa7ffc508465d63" alt=""
27 November 2013 | 9 replies
They charge for one simple reason, idiots pay.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2069/d20691e72f7cb6c7b6d797792368f819d3215057" alt=""
20 November 2008 | 0 replies
Is it that simple?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baeec/baeecce4ed63437c19ff25f53805e70d2156f9be" alt=""
5 December 2008 | 25 replies
The problem is very simple - we've spent too much (on every level) to support an unearned standard of living for decades.